WHO WROTE THE MUSIC WHEN JESUS SAY YES NOBODY CAN SAY NO FULL
WHO WROTE THE MUSIC WHEN JESUS SAY YES NOBODY CAN SAY NO PROFESSIONAL

WHO WROTE THE MUSIC WHEN JESUS SAY YES NOBODY CAN SAY NO PROFESSIONAL

Why would he? That's what a title page, superscription, or subscription at the end of the article or post is for! When I write a professional article in philosophy, I never put my name into the body of the text. If you glance through the body of the text of many, many books, articles, and even blog posts, you will find that the author almost never pauses and names himself in the body of his text.

More: A great many modern books on your shelves and mine are 'anonymous' in this fairly pointless, and, yes, technical sense. If that is literally all that is meant by 'anonymous,' then the gospels are still anonymous today! For the bodies of their texts have not changed, and the authors did not name themselves in the body of the text. 'Anonymous writings areД«ooks where the authors do not tell us their names.'Д«ut let's think about that for a moment. In the debate, around minute 33, Ehrman tries to say that this is 'not a technicality.' 'That's what anonymous writings are,' he says.

It is an absolutely standard part of Ehrman's approach to this issue that he defines 'anonymous' in a very narrow sense which is impossible to dispute but then slides in his usage to a much broader meaning without defending the slide. Tim points out in the radio debate (around minute 29) that the sense in which Ehrman is using the word 'anonymous' is compatible with everyone's having always known who wrote the gospels! Tim points out that all that is meant by their being formally anonymous, and all that can be shown, is that in the body of the text the book's author does not identify himself.

This claim, in various wordings, is made by Ehrman times without number in his writings on the subject of who wrote the gospels, and the claim that the gospels were originally anonymous also comes up in the podcast with Tim. 'The gospels were circulated anonymously at first.' (I have, for now, obtained a paid membership at Ehrman's blog, so some of the exact quotes here will be fair use of portions of articles that, in their entirety, are behind a paywall.) When I refer to the interview my indications of minutes will be approximate. In preparation I have also read some additional material by Ehrman as background. After listening to the podcast, I decided that it would be useful to come back to the subject in writing, re-emphasize and say more about some points Tim made, and make some additional points.

Eventually he decided (understandably) that enough time had been spent on that subject and moved along to other topics. Justin Brierley, the show's host, decided to take the early part of the discussion in the direction of the authorship of the gospels. I decided to write this post first, since it is related to Part I, and then listen to Part II.

WHO WROTE THE MUSIC WHEN JESUS SAY YES NOBODY CAN SAY NO FULL

Full disclosure: I haven't yet listened to Part II. A few weeks ago my husband, Tim McGrew, a specialist in epistemology and the history and philosophy of science, recorded two one-hour, back-to-back sessions of an informal radio debate with New Testament scholar Bart Ehrman on the British show Unbelievable.

Who wrote the music when jesus say yes nobody can say no